The obesity epidemic isn't just about what we're eating; it's about everything else. Consider this: prior to the 1990s, Australia was largely untouched by the obesity and diabetes crises plaguing the world today. What happened? Did our eating habits suddenly change overnight? Or, as some might argue, have our food regulators been caught napping? Perhaps the surge in highly processed and 'junk' food availability (as highlighted in a recent article) is a significant factor. But is that the whole story?
Let's be honest, how many of us meticulously tracked our sugar intake or worried about 'questionable' foods back then? Daily gym visits weren't exactly the norm either.
But here's where it gets controversial... Obesity can also be a side effect of medications like antidepressants and psychotropics, which Australia consumes in astonishing quantities. Why is this happening? Furthermore, it's also a stress reaction. But why would people be stressed in a country often dubbed 'lucky'? And let's not forget the simple reality: people eat what they can afford.
So, in the midst of a cost-of-living crisis that has stretched for over two decades, fueled by stagnant wages, wage theft, underpaid contract work, inadequate welfare, and sky-high household debt, what exactly are we expecting people to eat? Instead of just pointing fingers at the most obvious culprits, shouldn't we be asking tougher questions?
What do you think? Are we focusing on the right issues when it comes to tackling obesity? Do you agree that factors beyond diet play a significant role? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
